• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color


BGay.com News

Saturday, Nov 21st, 2009
BGay News
Investigation on Mormon Prop 8 Donations
 
on 11-25-2008 13:48

 Mormons

California officials have begun an investigation into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints to see if it broke the law during the campaign for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

365Gay writes:

The California Fair Political Practices Commission said it wants to determine if the Church accurately described its role in the battle over Proposition 8.

The Commission's executive director, Roman Porter, said the investigation follows a complaint by Californians Against Hate which accuses the Mormon Church of failing to report the value of work it did to support Proposition 8.

Porter said that while the complaint merits further inquiry, it does not mean any wrongdoing by the Church has been determined.

The Salt Lake City-based Mormon Church was heavily involved in the campaign to pass Prop. 8. It encouraged its members to work to pass California's Proposition 8 by volunteering their time and money for the campaign. Thousands of Mormons from across the country worked as grassroots volunteers.

The Church put an estimated $25 million into the battle to end gay marriage in California.

If the Commission finds the Church broke state election laws, it could be fined up to $5,000 per violation. The Commission also could file an additional civil lawsuit. Porter said, seeking remedies up to three times the amount that was misrepresented or misreported. 

Since the November election, the Mormon Church has become a prime target of LGBT civil rights groups. There have been protests at Mormon churches in California; in Utah, a number of churches were vandalized; and hoax mailings containing a white powder were sent to church leaders in Salt Lake City.

Meanwhile, the California Supreme Court last week accepted three lawsuits seeking to nullify Proposition 8, which overruled the court's decision in May  legalizing gay marriage.

All three cases claim the measure abridges the civil rights of a vulnerable minority group. They argue that voters alone did not have the authority to enact such a significant constitutional change.

As is its custom when it takes up cases, the court elaborated little. However, the justices did say they want to address what effect, if any, a ruling upholding the amendment would have on the estimated 18,000 same-sex marriages that were sanctioned in California before Election Day.

The initiative's opponents had also asked the court to grant a stay of the measure, which would have allowed gay marriages to begin again while the justices considered the cases. The court denied that request.

The justices directed Attorney General Jerry Brown and lawyers for the Yes on 8 campaign to submit arguments by Dec. 19 on why the ballot initiative should not be nullified. It said lawyers for the plaintiffs, who include same-sex couples who did not wed before the election, must respond before Jan. 5.

Oral arguments could be scheduled as early as March, but a ruling would not be likely for months after that.

 

Last update: 11-25-2008 13:48

Quote this article in website Print Send to friend



Users' Comments (6)
Posted by To Clarify, on 11-25-2008 17:14,
1. The Church did NOT donate
Clarification: The article states that Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints "put an estimated $25 million into the battle to end gay marriage in California." 
 
Not true. The MEMBERS of the church voluntarily chose to donate money. I keep reading talk of the church having its tax exempt status revoked. Nonsense. Opponents may wish this to be the case, but it is not based on fact. 
 
Let's keep the arguments accurate.
 
» Report this comment to administrator

Posted by Joe, on 11-26-2008 01:51,
2. Let's not split hairs
Is that your defense? It wasn't the church, it was the church's membership?? 
 
If you mean the actual leadership of the church can't be held responsible for the actions of the parishoners, that is a very narrow reason. If it can be shown that the church leadership itself exhorted the members to donate individually, then that could still be a violation. How else do you explain the massive response from Mormon rank and file? The LDS church is skating on thin ice as it is. It was an instigator, and is not absolved of its complicity.
 
» Report this comment to administrator

Posted by S.Johnson, on 11-26-2008 12:49,
3. Live what you preach
It is frightening that the tolerance that you demand is not given to people with opposing view points, Volunteers of many religious faiths volunteered to campaign for what they believe in as did the No on 8 camp. What part of the Democratic process don't you get? Sir Elton John said that domestic partnerships hold all of the rights and priviledges that a gay couple needs, Marriage between a man and a woman is the basis for all civilizations, You still need an egg and sperm to reproduce and no matter how you manipulate it the biology speaks for itself. People, not a church voted,
 
» Report this comment to administrator

Posted by TGM, on 11-28-2008 16:13,
4. Mmm... Mormon.
Democratic process, nothing. It's unconstitutional. It should never have even been on the ballot. 
 
You demand tolerance of the outcome while approving an unconstitutional removal of rights and endorsing intolerance. 
 
PS: Mormon boys? So hot. And the best part? They're practically married.
 
» Report this comment to administrator

Posted by CJP1, on 11-29-2008 18:11,
5. cjp1
Nonsense, notheing. The mormons squirmed thru a loophole by essentially ordering its minions to donate, something that should be no more legal than the church donating after tithing. Commenter, don't treat the rest of us like idiots. Your point is point-less.
 
» Report this comment to administrator

More comments...

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
BGAY NEWS
  • Pause
  • Previous
  • Next
1/10
John Mayer John Mayer: I Didn'n Kiss a Man After recent rumors about a steamy gay kiss between pop-star John Mayer and another guy, Mayer went on Twitter to make thinks straight.
Read more...
 
BGAY NEWS SECTION
Marc Jacobs glam Nars Lets Marc Jacobs Glam It Up To celebrate the 15th birthday of his eponymous makeup and skin care line, François Nars photographed 15 of his favorite celebrities and fashion people in situations inspired by the names of his products, which are culled from film and fashion history. Read more...