• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color


BGay.com News

Saturday, Nov 21st, 2009
BGay News
Lawsuits Filed to Challenge Prop. 8
 
on 11-06-2008 10:30

 Gay marriage

Gay rights supporters filed three lawsuits Wednesday asking the California Supreme Court to overturn Proposition 8, arguing that the measure is an illegal constitutional revision because it fundamentally alters the guarantee of equal protection.

LA Times writes:

The state high court has twice before struck down ballot measures as illegal constitutional revisions, but those initiatives involved "a broader scope of changes," said former California Supreme Court Justice Joseph Grodin, who publicly opposed Proposition 8 and was part of an earlier legal challenge to it. The court has suggested that a revision may be distinguished from an amendment by the breadth and the nature of the change, Grodin said

Still, Grodin said, he believes that the challenge has legal merit, though he declined to make any predictions.

Jennifer Pizer, a staff lawyer for Lambda Legal, said the initiative met the test of a revision because it had far-reaching magnitude.

"The magnitude here is that you are effectively rendering equal protection a nullity if a simple majority can so easily carve an exception into it," she said. "Equal protection is supposed to prevent the targeting and subjugation of a minority group by a simple majority vote."

The first action was filed by the ACLU, the National Center for Lesbian Rights and Lambda Legal. Santa Clara County and the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles also sued, and Los Angeles lawyer Gloria Allred filed a third suit on behalf of a married lesbian couple.

All the lawsuits cited the constitutional revision argument, and two of them asked the court to block Proposition 8 from taking effect while the legal cases were pending.

"The court must hold that California may not issue licenses to non-gay couples because if it does it would be violating the equal protection clause," Allred said at a news conference.

In addition to going to court, gay rights advocates sought to assure about 18,000 same-sex couples that their marriages will remain valid.

The groups cited comments by Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown, who has said the initiative was not retroactive. If the marriages are challenged in court, that case too would go to the California Supreme Court. Experts differ on whether the law would protect the marriages.

Last update: 11-06-2008 10:30

Quote this article in website Print Send to friend



Users' Comments (0)

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
BGAY NEWS
  • Pause
  • Previous
  • Next
1/10
John Mayer John Mayer: I Didn'n Kiss a Man After recent rumors about a steamy gay kiss between pop-star John Mayer and another guy, Mayer went on Twitter to make thinks straight.
Read more...
 
BGAY NEWS SECTION
Marc Jacobs glam Nars Lets Marc Jacobs Glam It Up To celebrate the 15th birthday of his eponymous makeup and skin care line, François Nars photographed 15 of his favorite celebrities and fashion people in situations inspired by the names of his products, which are culled from film and fashion history. Read more...