Unregistered
November 3rd, 2006, 02:00 AM
I highly recommend that prior to hacking up the truth (your YouTube footage was obviously taken out of context purposefully) that a publication such as www.bgay.com thoroughly researches facts. If the pastor from Colorado, Ted Haggard, turns out to be under a misled accusation your attempts to appeal to the public will be reduced to that of The 'Enquirer' or The "Jerry Springer Show". I don't think that's what you're aiming for.
We're not just talking about a gay man (Mike Jones) bringing out some moral dilemma, we're talking about an admitted prostitute pointing a finger. He suggests that he felt it was his duty to bring about these 'facts'. Are we so challenged that leaning on a prostitute's ethical stance is credible as soon as it hits the airwaves? Is that what you want to represent as an organization? Did you get so excited at the idea that someone may become poisonous to an 'opposing community' that you jumped on the attack before investigating? I'm not sure this is the type of quality that should represent a large civil group.
I recommend looking into this a little more. Anyone who suggests otherwise is more foe than friend. You are doing a disservice to the gay community at this point.
We're not just talking about a gay man (Mike Jones) bringing out some moral dilemma, we're talking about an admitted prostitute pointing a finger. He suggests that he felt it was his duty to bring about these 'facts'. Are we so challenged that leaning on a prostitute's ethical stance is credible as soon as it hits the airwaves? Is that what you want to represent as an organization? Did you get so excited at the idea that someone may become poisonous to an 'opposing community' that you jumped on the attack before investigating? I'm not sure this is the type of quality that should represent a large civil group.
I recommend looking into this a little more. Anyone who suggests otherwise is more foe than friend. You are doing a disservice to the gay community at this point.