
Obama Defends Gospel Tour to Gay Press
Presidential candidate Barack Obama spoke to
The Advocate Friday on why he decided to include homophobic Rev. Donnie
McClurkin on his three-day gospel tour of South Carolina.
The Advocate: How did this happen? Was Mr. McClurkin vetted?
Senator
Obama: Obviously, not vetted to the extent that people were aware of
his attitudes with respect to gay and lesbians, LGBT issues -- at least
not vetted as well as I would have liked to see.
Having said that, we viewed this simply as an opportunity to have a
gospel concert as part of our overall outreach, and since he was singing
at a concert along with a number of other artists, as opposed to being a
spokesperson for us, probably it didn’t undergo the same kind of vet
that someone who was serving as a surrogate for me might have.
The Advocate: I know you’re in a difficult position here
trying to balance these two constituencies -- but by keeping McClurkin
on the tour, didn't you essentially choose your Christian constituency
over your gay constituency?
Senator Obama: No, I profoundly disagree with that. This is not a
situation where I have backed off my positions one iota. You’re talking
to somebody who talked about gay Americans in his convention speech in
2004, who talked about them in his announcement speech for the president
of the United States, who talks about gay Americans almost constantly in
his stump speeches. If there’s somebody out there who’s been more
consistent in including LGBT Americans in his or her vision of what
America should be, then I would be interested in knowing who that person
is.
One of the things that always comes up in presidential campaigns is, if
you’ve got multiple supporters all over the place, should the candidate
then be held responsible for the every single view of every one of his
supporters? And obviously that’s not possible. And if I start playing
that game, then it will be very difficult for me to do what I think I
can do best, which is bring the country together.
Look, when I went to Rick Warren’s church at Saddleback, he was under
enormous heat because, among his constituency, my position on LGBT
issues and my position on abortion is anathema. So his position could
have been, we will not have Obama speak because he does not subscribe to
our views on these two issues. To his credit, he allowed me to speak, in
his church, from his pulpit, to 2,000 evangelicals. And I didn’t trim my
remarks, I specifically told them, “I think you guys are wrong when it
comes to issues like condom distribution.” And by the way, I got a
standing ovation.
My views on gay issues and on choice issues are well-known. I did not
trim my sails in the conversation I had with them. And I think as a
consequence of appearances like that, I am helping to encourage
understanding that will ultimately strengthen the cause of LGBT rights.
At some point, if we are going to have a conversation on these issues,
what I expect to be judged by in the LGBT community is, have I been a
strong advocate, have I been a forceful advocate, have I avoided these
issues in any way. And If I have not, then that’s how I expect to be
judged.
Read the whole interview
here. |